February 4, 2013

Sources for this posting were taken from information derived from research by a team of scientists working to perfect an atomic clock.  The Georgia Institute of Technology, The University of Nevada and   The University of New South Wales, Australia provided the team. 

I work with a few individuals, very few thank goodness, who don’t know what month it is much less what time of day it is.   Don’t get me wrong, these people are really great to work with but their routine never seems to change from one day to another; i.e., to work by 0700 hrs, lunch at 1130, punch out at 1530 hrs, home by 1800, dinner and then TV until bedtime.  That’s their life and apparently the life they have chosen, even when given alternatives.  There are others who follow a different and much more exciting path.

Researchers at The Georgia Institute of Technology, The University of Nevada and The University of New South Wales in Australia have been working on a remarkable project to develop a “time-piece” unparalled in human history.  You certainly can’t wear it on your wrist and it is bigger than a bread box—a nuclear clock.

The ability to record time is an integral part of scientific investigation.  We use descriptive information to characterize an object and define its existence and state of matter.  Physical descriptors such as length, width, height, weight, mass, density, specific gravity, caloric value are just a few of the many characteristics commonly given for existing objects.   Any movement of an object must, by necessity, involve a time element.  Velocity, acceleration, the use of GPS, accurate tracking of objects, astronomical investigations are significantly dependent upon accurate timekeeping.  For this reason, scientists have always worked toward developing better clocks.  The more precise the timekeeping, the more precise the answer(s) to any scientific endeavor.

A clock accurate to within a tenth of a second over 14 billion years – the age of the universe – is the goal of research being reported this week by scientists from three different institutions. To be published in the journal Physical Review Letters, the research provides the blueprint for a nuclear clock that would get its extreme accuracy from the nucleus of a single thorium ion.



This RF ion trap holds individual thorium atoms while they are laser-cooled to near absolute zero temperature.

Such a clock could be useful for certain forms of secure communication – and perhaps of greater interest – for studying the fundamental theories of physics. A nuclear clock could be as much as one-hundred times more accurate than current atomic clocks, which now serve as the basis for the global positioning system (GPS) and a broad range of important measurements.

“If you give people a better clock, they will use it,” said Alex Kuzmich, a professor in the School of Physics at the Georgia Institute of Technology and one of the paper’s co-authors. “For most applications, the atomic clocks we have are precise enough. But there are other applications where having a better clock would provide a real advantage.”

Beyond the Georgia Tech physicists, scientists in the School of Physics at the University of New South Wales in Australia and at the Department of Physics at the University of Nevada also contributed to the study. The research has been supported by the Office of Naval Research, the National Science Foundation and the Gordon Godfrey fellowship.

Early clocks used a swinging pendulum to provide the oscillations needed to track time. In modern clocks, quartz crystals provide high-frequency oscillations that act like a tuning fork, replacing the old-fashioned pendulum. Atomic clocks derive their accuracy from laser-induced oscillations of electrons in atoms. However, these electrons can be affected by magnetic and electrical fields, allowing atomic clocks to drift ever so slightly – about four seconds in the lifetime of the universe.

Ultra-High Vacuum Chamber


This image shows an ultra-high vacuum chamber housing an RF ion trap where single thorium atoms are suspended and laser-cooled to near absolute zero temperature.

Because neutrons are much heavier than electrons and densely packed in the atomic nucleus, they are less susceptible to these perturbations than the electrons. A nuclear clock should therefore be less affected by environmental factors than its atomic cousin.

“In our paper, we show that by using lasers to orient the electrons in a very specific way, we can use the neutron of an atomic nucleus as the clock pendulum,” said Corey Campbell, a research scientist in the Kuzmich laboratory and the paper’s first author.  “Because the neutron is held so tightly to the nucleus, its oscillation rate is almost completely unaffected by any external perturbations.”

To create the oscillations, the researchers plan to use a laser operating at petahertz frequencies — 10 (15) oscillations per second — to boost the nucleus of a thorium 229 ion into a higher energy state. Tuning a laser to create these higher energy states would allow scientists to set its frequency very precisely, and that frequency would be used to keep time instead of the tick of a clock or the swing of a pendulum.

The nuclear clock ion will need to be maintained at a very low temperature – tens of microkelvins – to keep it still. To produce and maintain such temperatures, physicists normally use laser cooling. But for this system, that would pose a problem because laser light is also used to create the timekeeping oscillations.

Linear Chain


Shown is a linear chain of 29 laser-cooled Th3+ atoms suspended in vacuum by an RF ion trap. The atoms are near absolute zero temperature and repel each other via Coulomb repulsion because of their like charges.

To solve that problem, the researchers include a single thorium 232 ion with the thorium 229 ion that will be used for time-keeping. The heavier ion is affected by a different wavelength than the thorium 229. The researchers then cooled the heavier ion, which also lowered the temperature of the clock ion without affecting the oscillations.   “The cooling ion acts as a refrigerator, keeping the clock ion very still,” said Alexander Radnaev, a graduate research assistant in the Kuzmich lab. “This is necessary to interrogate this clock ion for very long and to make a very accurate clock that will provide the next level of performance.”  Calculations suggest that a nuclear clock could be accurate to 10 (-19), compared to 10 (-17) for the best atomic clock.



Research scientist Corey Campbell and graduate research assistant Alex Radnaev make adjustments to optimize the overlap of laser beams used to cool trapped atoms. The work is part of a Georgia Tech research project aimed at developing an ultra-precise nuclear clock.

Because they operate in slightly different ways, atomic clocks and nuclear clocks could one day be used together to examine differences in physical constants. “Some laws of physics may not be constant in time,” Kuzmich said. “Developing better clocks is a good way to study this.”  Though the research team believes it has now demonstrated the potential to make a nuclear clock – which was first proposed in 2003 – it will still be a while before they can produce a working one.  The major challenge ahead is that the exact frequency of the ultraviolet laser emissions needed to excite the thorium nucleus hasn’t yet been determined, despite the efforts of many different research groups.  “People have been looking for this for 30 years,” Campbell said. “It’s worse than looking for a needle in a haystack. It’s more like looking for a needle in a million haystacks.”      But Kuzmich believes that that problem will be solved, allowing physicists to move to the next-generation of phenomenally accurate timekeepers.   “Our research shows that building a nuclear clock in this way is both worthwhile and feasible,” Kuzmich said. “We now have the tools and plans needed to move forward in realizing this system.”

I think this is a marvelous research program and one which will yield great dividends in years to come.  I, for one, certainly intend to follow their progress and one day hope to “lay hands” upon a physical specimen.

I certainly welcome your comments.


2 Responses to “NUCLEAR CLOCK”

  1. Hi you have a fantastic weblog over here! Thanks for sharing this interesting stuff for us! If you keep up this good work I’ll visit your weblog again. Thanks!


    • cielotech Says:

      Hello there. Certainly happy you enjoyed Nuclear Clock. This one was fascinating to me and I had absolutely no idea time could be so fun to “keep”. Take care.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: